• Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They just did.

    Eating meat = a neutral action that has no moral dilemma.

    How we produce meat products = a large and complex question that does pose an ethical/moral dilemma centered around methods of production.

    How is that so hard to understand?

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      Because something is ‘natural’ does not mean that its moral.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        Never said it was moral. I said it was specifically amoral, as in “has nothing to do with your arbitrary sense of morality”. Try reading again.