• NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    I knew this was coming at some point. Forced updates need to be illegal, or allow users to roll back updates at their discretion.

    When you buy something, the seller cannot enter your house without permission and break it. Legal action is going to spread - Hisense should be next, they did the same thing to me.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You fail to mention, to buy that item you had to sign away your right to sue, and instead bring any dispute to binding arbitration of their choosing. Scotus endorsed this officially over a decade back, but it’s been standard since around 2001, also for low wage employment contracts.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The part that hasn’t been litigated is unilaterally modifying the agreement and whether you separately own the TV apart from the software covered by the click-wrap contact of adhesion.

        I think a court would decide you have the right to use the TV without the software if you disagree with the terms. Except they currently give you no way to do that.

        Further, it should be illegal to require an update that updates the terms, since the manufacturer effectively can force you to agree to new terms while holding your TV hostage.

        Contract rights have a limit, especially with TOS agreements that are not negotiable.