• TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    You’re right. The only reason someone would write something in Rust is to change the license. Nobody would use Rust for any other reason, nor would they use any other language for that purpose.

    • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Then what’s this push to rust everything? Even shit thats not a particular risk for memory safety?

        • Lucy :3@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s not, and it’s especially not to use resulting software. 90% of software I have problems with, let it be compilation errors or missing missing features due to bad libraries, is Rust

          • TehPers@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The anti-Rust circlejerk is strong, wow.

            I have loads of software written in Rust installed, many of which I compile myself. Not once has the language choice been an issue that I’ve had with the software. Some of that software may be missing features, but that has little to do with the language and more to do with my decision to install v0.1.4 of the software.

            Python, on the other hand…

            And while we’re on the topic of coreutils, why does every C and C++ project I look at require me to install dozens of random libraries myself? I guess because they’re dynamically linked, which is cool and all, except the page to install each dependency has an encyclopedia of a README written in 1984 in a text file. It’s not usually an issue, just annoying.