Rimu published yet another hit piece against the /0 instance and this time posted it in his own instance comms as well. One of his mods jumped in, admitted they don’t know anything about anything, but nevertheless felt confident enough to state their opinion as fact and in the process insult all of us collectively, then stickied his opinion for good measure.

So I decided to reply sarcastically, at which point that mod insulted me and locked the thread, which is apparently a feature in piefed which simply hides/deletes further replies in that thread, but since it’s not a feature in lemmy, it appears to function like a shadow delete.

This is what my last reply would have been.

(Yes I’m being snarky, but that “I’m so mature” bullshit just rubs me the wrong way.)

In my opinion, using mod powers to get the last insult in, is just bastard behaviour.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Does that mean the ban reason in the mod log isn’t the ban reason?

    • What value did you get out of the AI generation when deciding on the ban (assuming none based on your reply)?
    • Maybe more importantly, what value are you attributing to it for those who actually read the logs?

    Were the quotes in the AI summary actually used for “seeing if it was any good” at the time, and if so, what was the concision?