• lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I honestly think wiki, static hosting, package registries etc. don’t belong on a git repo. Github has continuously extended their feature-set, but its caused vendor lock-in which I think is the point. How hard is it to spin up a web service to host static content? There are loads of good open source wiki projects, etc.

    • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Depends on the point of the wiki I feel, if it’s project documentation it should be in git alongside the code, if it’s a generic “document store” then yeah there’s better storage backends than git.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Why do it yourself in a complicated way and poke holes in my firewall and security if I can use the existing infrastructure that is already a publiclly accessible web page to host just another one? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯