Since it’s widely accepted that the word “literally” can be used to add emphasis, we need another word that can be used when you want to make it clear that you really mean “literally” in the original sense.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 天前

      If you feel that it’s unfortunate, why take their side? I’ve found that no confusion is caused by using it the correct way. If any might be, it is at least in service of a noble cause.

      • iamthetot@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 天前

        Language evolves and, more ever than Merriam-Webster, the speakers and writers get to decide what words mean. While that does apply to you not wanting it mean that, you are swimming against the current in this case.

    • adam_y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 天前

      Dictionary compilation is descriptive, not prescriptive.

      They don’t “disagree” with anyone. They just report on how words are being used.

      You can’t get into an argument with a dictionary, no matter how hard you try.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 天前
      1. Mirriam-webster isn’t a great dictionary. It’s in the name.
      2. Dictionaries don’t say what’s correct; only what’s popular.