They were funded by one and found success in another.
They would have made sense if one worked and they were funded by the same industry
Would have made sense if they simply found success in their results and published them
They said that it works when combining coffee and fruit. Which one paid for it? Both would have told the other industry to pay for the study. It’s definitely only coffee or “fruit”.
One was actually meaningful. Guessing fruit was actually beneficial and coffee paid the bill but it’s definitely a red flag to include both in the finding. Either coffee is good and fruit is meaningless, or the other way around.
Tbh, “fruit” is such a large category that there’s no way they studied every fruit. They “studied coffee” and added “fruit” so they could post a benefit. I love coffee but this study is bullshit.
They were funded by one and found success in another.
They would have made sense if one worked and they were funded by the same industry
Would have made sense if they simply found success in their results and published them
They said that it works when combining coffee and fruit. Which one paid for it? Both would have told the other industry to pay for the study. It’s definitely only coffee or “fruit”.
One was actually meaningful. Guessing fruit was actually beneficial and coffee paid the bill but it’s definitely a red flag to include both in the finding. Either coffee is good and fruit is meaningless, or the other way around.
Tbh, “fruit” is such a large category that there’s no way they studied every fruit. They “studied coffee” and added “fruit” so they could post a benefit. I love coffee but this study is bullshit.