The U.S. Department of Justice is ramping up its case against Google’s alleged monopoly, suggesting the government could eventually force the company to sell its widely-used Chrome browser. The move is part of the DoJ’s push to challenge Google’s hold over the digital advertising and search engine markets.

The Justice Department’s latest legal action accuses Google of engaging in anticompetitive behavior by unfairly using its dominance in search and advertising to prop up its other services, most notably Chrome. The government argues that Google’s browser and vast data ecosystem have given the company an outsized advantage over competitors, stifling innovation and harming consumers. By bundling Chrome with its Android operating system, Google has built an extensive network that could limit consumer choice and make it difficult for smaller firms to compete.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re an open platform. Anyone can buy ad time on their platforms. It has nothing to do with Google and everything to do with people buying ad time.

    If you’re going to be pissed, then be pissed. Just be right.

    • PreciousPig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Guns don’t kill people, people do!” No structural issues here to see, please proceed /s

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        More like, if you sell a gun and follow the law, you’re not responsible if the person you sold the gun to murders someone…

        They’re an ad agency. They sell ad space. If “anti-abortion” people buy ads, that doesn’t mean that Google is pushing anti-abortion. How anyone could think like that is frankly the epitome of stupidity.

    • turmoil@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Just thinking one step further: If I have capital, I control the ads and content.

      Thank god the rich are interested in human rights.