It’s called making an argument using facts. As opposed to you, who makes no claims whatsoever and only waxed poetically about idealism without any connection to actual events. At least I’m talking about planet earth. Do you want wall of texts of links? Is that what would make you happy? You would come up with some other deflection and not look at them after I spend a couple hours aggregating them anyway, which is why I generally haven’t bothered, because Liberal like you don’t generally read or care.
Is it using facts? Am I supposed to just take you at your word because you said it? Like I’ve already said, I’ve heard the claims, but nobody ever has the proof at hand. When they can muster anything at all, it’s typically tangential at best. I’m willing to look at evidence, but if you expect me not to be critical of something just because it says something you agree with and want me to believe, I have bad news for you.
Oh hey, look, exactly what I said happens every time, a whole bunch of claims with zero evidence at all.
It’s called making an argument using facts. As opposed to you, who makes no claims whatsoever and only waxed poetically about idealism without any connection to actual events. At least I’m talking about planet earth. Do you want wall of texts of links? Is that what would make you happy? You would come up with some other deflection and not look at them after I spend a couple hours aggregating them anyway, which is why I generally haven’t bothered, because Liberal like you don’t generally read or care.
Is it using facts? Am I supposed to just take you at your word because you said it? Like I’ve already said, I’ve heard the claims, but nobody ever has the proof at hand. When they can muster anything at all, it’s typically tangential at best. I’m willing to look at evidence, but if you expect me not to be critical of something just because it says something you agree with and want me to believe, I have bad news for you.