• FrederikNJS@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To be honest I don’t know (also not OP) but if the gold is one solid chunk there might be chance that it will function as a large enough heatsink that it wont “burn”… But then again it’s probably not just one chunk… So some of the outer layers might “burn” as you say, but the gold atoms are not lost. That would require a nuclear reaction… Instead some of that gold would turn into liquid, and some would turn into gas. In this state it might reach with other elements in the atmosphere, but if it doesn’t it will turn back into solid form again when it cools. In that case the result would be microscopic gold clumps spread over a huge area.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      That makes more sense, thanks. So those pieces would be harder to recover. I’m trying to figure out how much of it they lose in such an operation. Is it like half of the amount? Or is it like single digit percentages?

      I suppose even if they lose half, it would still be better than trying to put it in earth orbit and trying to mine it there. So ultimately that would be the preferred approach.

      And maybe not kill millions of people in the process.