This is more than the average fossil car owner pays in gas taxes, and really bad policy during a world fuel shortage.

  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sympathetic to the argument that we replace the 18.5 cents per gallon federal tax with something EV drivers (myself included) still pay. But it should incentivize further EV adoption and not discourage it, and should somehow scale with miles driven (incentives fewer miles driven.)

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      It should be something everybody pays. Not just EV drivers. The only fair road tax is to measure the distance driven every year during a car inspection and use the car/truck/bus weight to charge per mile driven.

      This is the perfect time to switch to a mileage tax, because you can get rid of the tax at the pump and politically look like a “winner”, while actually bringing in more revenue. The gas tax hasn’t been raised since 1993.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There a privacy implication for the tracking mileage I’m not thrilled with, and would support an opt-out but paying more than average system.

        Gas tax is/was ingenious because it was not privacy invasive and scaled perfectly with use. But not applicable in the age of EVs.

      • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This fair share concept is crazy to me. The vast majority of road wear comes from Semi Trucks, to why doesn’t anyone want them to pay their fair share?

        • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          If the funding comes from a federal fuel tax, then the higher per gallon tax on diesel (and the much higher fuel consumption that cargo trucks have) mean they actually do.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You must be in Europe. Vehicles in North America are not inspected. They drive until they fall apart.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      How about an EV fast charger tax? Same as gas.

      If you charge at home, it’s tax free. Just like a gas tank in your back yard would be, I assume.

      I think Republicans would buy that too, as it’s still technically “EV negative” and not very visible to constituents (just like the gas tax).

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just like a gas tank in your back yard would be, I assume.

        How’d you get gas in your backyard tank without paying the tax? And if charging at home is tax free that just benefits the wealthier home owners more than that (probably less wealthy on average) renter.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Greasel (diesel-vegetable oil conversion) is a thing, albeit uncommon. That would probably be the closest analogue.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I assumed it would be wholesale prices. I guess cracking and refining oil yourself, or brewing biofuel, would be the analogue to backyard solar or whatever.

          Part of the point is that “home gas” for local commutes and such is hilariously impractical, whereas that’s not the case for EVs.

          • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Farmers are able to get diesel fuel without paying the tax. It’s dyed red if I recall correctly. It wasn’t super uncommon for a farmer to get his truck inspected to make sure he wasn’t driving on the roadways with untaxed fuel.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I quite like that idea, but would worry that home charging would leave too much road maintenance unfunded. Maybe a combination of a low flat EV fee and your fast charger tax.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I dunno. Psychologically, buyers don’t like an upfront tax. It’s just how our monkey brains are.

          …How about an EV tax proportional to vehicle mass, or maybe battery mass/capacity? With a cutoff for tiny, cheap EVs. This would tax commercial vehicles and ridiculous luxury EVs like the Hummer EV, but incentivize small EVs or plug in hybrids. And it “makes sense” because heavy, long range vehicles wear roads more.