No in this particular conflict. The one where you so astutely asserted the value of civilian lives. I agree with you that is a pretty valid standard on the morality of the warring nations.
I need this to ascertain how many civilian lives you are willing to allow per side. This is to check for what you call ‘hippcrisy’ where you weigh certain lives heavier than others.
I agree that this measure should be accounted for in every conflict, but in ths case I suspect some bias from one that self proclaims to be a tankie.
How many innocent citizens did the UA kill and how many did Russia kill ?
No in this particular conflict. The one where you so astutely asserted the value of civilian lives. I agree with you that is a pretty valid standard on the morality of the warring nations.
I need this to ascertain how many civilian lives you are willing to allow per side. This is to check for what you call ‘hippcrisy’ where you weigh certain lives heavier than others.
I agree that this measure should be accounted for in every conflict, but in ths case I suspect some bias from one that self proclaims to be a tankie.
How many innocent citizens did the UA kill and how many did Russia kill ?
(I’ll allow you to leave deportation out of this)
There is a difference between collaterals and deliberately targeting civilians which the west does