• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada’s proposed Bill C-22

• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata

• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    First of all the second part was in the news just like 6 9 months ago, I might not have an entirely right but that’s generally what they did, they took the word off governments over people. Second of all I happen to know they accept blacklists as trustworthy, I know because someone who isn’t me is on one and they refused them an account.

    In truth they are Israel’s bitch. In short.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I might not have an entirely right but that’s generally what they did, they took the word off governments over people

      No they didn’t. Thats not “generally” what they did at all. You’re just spreading more misinformation that you admittedly aren’t even very confident about.

      Second of all I happen to know they accept blacklists as trustworthy, I know because someone who isn’t me is on one and they refused them an account.

      Do you have any proof of this? Or are you just going with “I heard from a guy”?

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Is it this, or something else?

      https://theintercept.com/2025/09/12/proton-mail-journalist-accounts-suspended/

      I’ve been following this on X/Twitter and I think one of the most egregious things that’s important to point out is that folks from Phrack reached out to Proton in private multiple times, and Proton ghosted them. Proton only engaged with them and then reinstated the accounts after Phrack went public and their X/Twitter post went viral. It also looks like one of the writers filed an appeal with Proton and Proton denied the appeal, so they manually investigated the incident and refused to reinstate the account and then only did after this got attention on X/Twitter.

      https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45227316

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        @Photonic@lemmy.world @mabeledo@lemmy.world @EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world I’m glad you took the time to look at my post, but why did you dislike it? Did the new information offend you in some way?

        • mabeledo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Because it’s dumb.

          Proton then stated that they “stand with journalists” but “cannot see the content of accounts and therefore cannot always know when anti-abuse measures may inadvertently affect legitimate activism.”

          Every legitimate email service has anti abuse policies in place. The alternative is letting the service be turned into a bot farming operation, or worse.

          Still waiting for your recommended alternatives.

        • Photonic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          It’s just incredibly stupid and short-sighted.

          Edit: also, how are you tracking your downvotes? Serious question.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          You were trying to help out that other misinformation bot find the made up event he was talking about and you couldn’t. I downvoted it because that’s what you’re supposed to do with unhelpful information.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The information I provided was true. Why are you lying about it?

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              The information you provided did not prove what he said at all. Why are you lying about it?

              Rhetorical of course, you’re a misinformation bot.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I do read The Intercept but that article is not what I’m talking about, there’s something else that was a lot worse than that that they did just last year. Someone who isn’t me signed up for an account and it’s totally legit and was denied because they’re on a blacklist because Israel and there was no way to like appeal on proton.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’d love to see that article if you can find it. I’ll add it to a folder’s worth of bookmarks that is growing larger than it should.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I was just saying my comment that while I do read that publication what I’m talking about is a direct experience of someone who is not me.