• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada’s proposed Bill C-22

• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata

• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    You sound like you would be absolutely outraged if you found out Proton marketed itself towards activists. Have you looked at the promises on their homepage recently?

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Shifting the blame of corporate lies onto the activist they lie to.

        You socialist anarchists area a funny bunch.

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You know who really lied? The French authorities. Had they truthfully informed the swiss court about the reality of the situation, they would have gotten a tactful variant of “get lost” as a response from the swiss.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I find it funny how you socialists look at a company homepage, read

            We are a neutral and safe haven for your personal data, committed to defending your freedom.

            and then decide to defend that company’s lie.

            • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              defending freedom under the rules of swiss laws, which are pretty neutral when put in worldwide perspective. Also, “defending your freedom” is not equivalent with “selfdestruct for your freedom”. What would have been the alternative? you remind me of this:

              • XLE@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                “Proton should be honest somewhat”

                “And yet activists stupidly trusted their marketing and signed up!”

                • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  You still haven’t offered an alternative to cooperating with an court order of the country your business is located in - as long as you can’t do that, every further discussion is pointless.

                  • XLE@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    Why do you have the lowest possible bar for proton while you expect me to do their work for them?

                    I want the dishonest company to be honest somewhat. Do you not?