• flameleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If you type it in, the AI won’t do anything, but web page results look fine under that?

    • kescusay@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      True, but misses the point. The user interface is basically broken now, and the fact that you can scroll down to something useful doesn’t mean the broken bits don’t matter.

      • flameleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I always scroll past the AI summaries anyway because I’m not looking for misinformation

        • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          … Why? Why not just use something that doesn’t spew misinformation from the get-go?

          There’s so many alternative search engines that almost all let you turn off AI - pack your bags and find a new home.

          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I usually start with DDG, but it just doesn’t have anywhere near as much of the WWW in its index as Google does, so I very often don’t find what I’m looking for and switch back to Google.

            If someone has a suggestion for something better than either of them, do tell.

            • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Better is always subjective based on your priorities, search style, and the info you’re after.

              For free search, I find the results on Brave (who has their own index) to be roughly on par with Google (and Startpage which primarily sources Google’s index), but extra features like page ranking, disabling AI, etc. make Brave better for the user.

              DDG, Ecosia, etc., primarily rely on Bing’s index, which tends to fail me the most frequently.

              The only downside of Brave is the cryptobro owners who seem intent on speed running enshittification in everything they do. It works fine for now but I have very little trust in it not tanking long term.

              Personally I use Kagi and recommend it if paying for search works with your lifestyle. I tend to find what I’m looking for there fastest and rarely if ever do I have to ! bang my way over to another search engine. It has the most customization and features prioritizing human content over AI slop.

              It’s all personal preference though, so what works for one person may be unacceptable for another, and honestly having options/competition is a good thing.

          • flameleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I use DDG on my personal machine, but I work at a school and a lot of my students prefer Google despite my attempts to teach them otherwise.

        • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Does Google even give results that aren’t Reddit post or AI? I have not gotten single good thing from it in awhile.

      • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        In this case, Gemini actually introduced significant friction to those of us who didn’t ask for and don’t want a fucking AI prompt over our search, especially without a way to disable it.

        From my perspective, the introduction of the overview was a UX regression, and this actually restores the UI to what I want in the first place, so I don’t really care that it’s technically broken.