Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman

  • pmtriste@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think they meant to title this “Why these eight lying scumbags need to be primaried to prevent continuing slide into fascism”

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately Cuellar and Gonzalez won their primaries.

      Party leadership showed it preferred Cuellar over any progressive, and it’s exactly because of votes like this.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          What the hell is wrong with his district in Texas?

          The party demonstrated that it will do whatever it takes to defeat progressive candidates, so they stopped running.

          • WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wouldn’t a democratic voter pick a ham sandwich over someone pardoned by Trump and has voted in line with everything Trump has asked of him since the pardon? Seems like a good opportunity to get a progressive candidate in there.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Wouldn’t a democratic voter pick a ham sandwich over someone pardoned by Trump and has voted in line with everything Trump has asked of him since the pardon?

              The last time a progressive ran against him, the party threw everything it had behind Cuellar. This was before trump pardoned him, but after he made it clear that he was an anti-choice anti-labor pro-nra candidate. Cuellar won by something like 500 votes.

              Any progressive candidate has to fight against the Democratic party to win the nomination and then if they win anyway, they have to fight the Republican candidate with a depleted war chest and no support from their own party. Or as Mamdani showed, active antagonism from their own party.

              • WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                I would have hoped there may have been active antagonism at this point. Cuellar worse than Fetterman or a Republican and squishy brained Dems still voting for him.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  As long as the party backs him up (and since he does everything party leadership wants, they will keep doing so) his district doesn’t have anyone with the means to fight two major US political parties.

                  Not to mention, Cuellar has a documented history of corruption. I’m certain he has no problem abusing his office to kneecap opposition. After all, he’s a centrist democrat.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Party leadership threw its weight behind Cuellar in the 2022 primaries. He won against his underfunded opponent by something like 500 votes.

          Progressives have to successfully fight two parties back to back in order to be elected.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Gluesenkamp Perez is almost always on the wrong side of decisions like these. Unfortunately, her district is very mixed and not remotely a Democratic stronghold. A more progressive Democrat would be unlikely to win in her district.

      • 42firehawk@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There’s a pretty strong push from her primary opponent this year - he’s winning over local Republicans in conversation by focusing on medicare/Medicaid expansion.

        Edit: have to be clear he isn’t winning any Maga votes, but iffy republicans that were MGPs “base” since they were already dissuade from voting red from how batshit Joe Kent was.