Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe you should look it up then. Because, if you answer it for them, it’s not really rhetorical, is it?

    • zoloftt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You’re clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you.

      Have a nice day.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It’s not a literary device, though, is the problem.

        Also, as long as we’re talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as “angry” is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course.