• fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Even without the “browser loophole”, developers are pushing Google and Apple about further permissions being granted and sideloading and whatnot. Apple and Google careth not… Your argument is pretty moot at this point.

    And no, you can already do per website permissions. Or what the fuck do you think the notification settings are for, or the PER INSTANCE BASED REQUESTS for e.g. Bluetooth or USB device access? Or when a website asks you to access your camera or microphone? These are all instances of the browser having access and the website having to request permission separately from it…

    Each application should be separate so permissions are separate

    Ever heard of this nifty thing called “sandboxing” that browsers have been doing for, oh, about a decade now?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Even without the “browser loophole”, developers are pushing Google and Apple about further permissions being granted and sideloading and whatnot. Apple and Google careth not… Your argument is pretty moot at this point.

      No, not even without it. Without it there would be a significantly larger push. It wouldn’t just be a small movement. It’d be necessary. It’s like being on a computer and getting everything from the Microsoft store (if you’re on Windows). Sometimes they don’t have what you need, so basically every moderate user has had to download something elsewhere. It’d be the same on phones. Apple and Google would not be able to get away with preventing sideloading because every user and developer would care, not just the few of us there are now.