Yeah, I don’t care what their reasons are, they added malware to their own project to fuck over a portion of their user base. That’s not okay.
Let’s analogise: an artist discovers their art has been printed out and hung on the wall in the home of someone they don’t like. Does that artist have the right to try and burn down that person’s house in retribution?
Simple English is not malware. They didn’t do their due diligence either.
No code was executed. Failure to sandbox the AI agent you use is not the problem of the person who is providing free code databases to the internet at large.
When it was the guy doing this on LinkedIn and forcing AI agents that interacted with his profile to speak to him in old English and address him as “my lord” was that malware?
It’s malware as much as a zip bomb is malware. Both serve as input to another program to make it do a specific thing. That thing causes harm on the end user’s device. Asking an agent to speak in old English causes no such harm.
Malware (a portmanteau of malicious software) is any software intentionally designed to cause disruption to a computer, server, client, or computer network, leak private information, gain unauthorized access to information or systems, deprive access to information, or interfere with the user’s computer security and privacy without their knowledge.
Calling this malware is like calling a DDOS attack hacking.
People have been warned about the fact that there is the potential for an AI LLM to take direction from text without the user’s knowledge since this tech hit the mainstream. Additionally, it’s also not malware when Alex responds to its name while you’re watching a YouTube video.
These people infected their own computers with software that could be externally controlled on purpose. The LLM might be considered maleare since it’s working as designed, but the plain English isn’t.
Yes, I acknowledge that it isn’t malicious software. That’s why I compare it to a zip bomb. The important part isn’t “software”. It’s the “malicious”. None of what Obelisk said relies on this thing being software.
Warning: Do not use this release with an „AI“ Coding Agent of any form. The tool‘s output may confuse the agent and make it do unwanted things. See the paragraph in the user guide for details.
It’s like lighting a cigarette in a petrol station and being annoyed that they didn’t make it fire risk proof.
Also, what kind of security is applied nowadays that text can become an executable and no one bothered to put safeguards in place. This is like 90s internet, raw dogging data, no firewall, no encryption just pure unaltered and blind faith that it’s all dandy.
you might want to hear about this guy… banksy and this picture that was auctioned off only to be shredded as the auction was over…and maybe stew on that story for a minute…
Yeah, I don’t care what their reasons are, they added malware to their own project to fuck over a portion of their user base. That’s not okay.
Let’s analogise: an artist discovers their art has been printed out and hung on the wall in the home of someone they don’t like. Does that artist have the right to try and burn down that person’s house in retribution?
Lol, no. Not even close to the same thing. Go hyperbolize somewhere else.
Simple English is not malware. They didn’t do their due diligence either.
No code was executed. Failure to sandbox the AI agent you use is not the problem of the person who is providing free code databases to the internet at large.
When it was the guy doing this on LinkedIn and forcing AI agents that interacted with his profile to speak to him in old English and address him as “my lord” was that malware?
It’s malware as much as a zip bomb is malware. Both serve as input to another program to make it do a specific thing. That thing causes harm on the end user’s device. Asking an agent to speak in old English causes no such harm.
Calling this malware is like calling a DDOS attack hacking.
People have been warned about the fact that there is the potential for an AI LLM to take direction from text without the user’s knowledge since this tech hit the mainstream. Additionally, it’s also not malware when Alex responds to its name while you’re watching a YouTube video.
These people infected their own computers with software that could be externally controlled on purpose. The LLM might be considered maleare since it’s working as designed, but the plain English isn’t.
Yes, I acknowledge that it isn’t malicious software. That’s why I compare it to a zip bomb. The important part isn’t “software”. It’s the “malicious”. None of what Obelisk said relies on this thing being software.
Release Notes
It’s like lighting a cigarette in a petrol station and being annoyed that they didn’t make it fire risk proof.
Also, what kind of security is applied nowadays that text can become an executable and no one bothered to put safeguards in place. This is like 90s internet, raw dogging data, no firewall, no encryption just pure unaltered and blind faith that it’s all dandy.
When cartograhpers made up places to protect their business
No because that puts human life in danger and is not comparable.
You’re a flame retardant.
you might want to hear about this guy… banksy and this picture that was auctioned off only to be shredded as the auction was over…and maybe stew on that story for a minute…