RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agoJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1716arrow-down1183
arrow-up1533arrow-down1imageJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldRestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33·5 months agoNo, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
minus-squareZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·5 months agoMy favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
minus-squareDejected Warp Core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoAs long as it’s their autocrat, yes.
No, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
My favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
As long as it’s their autocrat, yes.