• nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s complicated I guess. People often use the “Nazi bar” analogy and I kinda get it. But I am also conflicted. Yes I disagree with their opinions and wish they will stop having those opinions. But on the other hand moderating them will just make them move to somewhere else, and they will still be having those opinions, and arguably in a worse environment. Because it would be more of a bubble with nobody countering them.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Forcing the most radical extremists underground won’t deprogram them, but it will make it significantly more difficult for them to spread propaganda. The point of deplatforming is to shut down the pipeline so that fewer people get radicalized.

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mean, 4chan isn’t that hard to find. IMO instead of trying to shield people from these “dangerous ideas” so they don’t get radicalized, why don’t we try teach more people critical thinking skills? Quarantine vs vaccination, I guess.

        • missingno@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Steam has far greater reach than 4chan. 4chan is the quarantine in your analogy, everyone else left that Nazi Bar after /pol/ happened.

          If you think you can teach the average Steam user critical thinking skills, I welcome you to go ahead and try. Have fun.

          • nialv7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            59 minutes ago

            that’s a bit defeatist, isn’t it. and you are underestimating 4chan, it has 86 million monthly active users, while steam has 132 million.