• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I could not give a shit.

    I can tell, since nothing else about your comment was at all related to what I was saying.

    • imahappyguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You’re right, I just gave you my personal experiences about parenting children. I even brought up my brother in recovery, distinctly because you brought up addicts. I still stand by it being a parental issue. Don’t have kids if you don’t want that responsibility. This kind of argument has the same vibes as, “we need age verification on websites”. No, we don’t. Parents need to be better. I’m a millennial parent and I know how the internet works. I also know that every app nowadays has parental controls built in. Moreso, I can specifically block things on the router. The tools are there. Just be a parent. How many children do you have?

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        We’re really far from the point now.

        I’m a millennial parent and I know how the internet works. I also know that every app nowadays has parental controls built in. Moreso, I can specifically block things on the router.

        Remember how you found ways to circumvent those things in your youth without your parents knowing? Guess what? Kids still do that. Parental controls only work on children who lack creativity.

        You aren’t going to be there 100% of the time for your kids. No parent would be. It would be abusive to be present 100% of the time. You’re going to trust your kids with a certain level of autonomy, and they’re occasionally going to do things with that autonomy that you disapprove of; that’s an important part of growing up. Maybe it’s swearing, maybe it’s getting into fights, maybe it’s cheating on homework, or maybe it’s buying lootboxes. You can’t block everything.

        Nobody’s saying that you shouldn’t try to prevent your kids from falling into these traps. By all means, you should. But you shouldn’t expect to be successful 100% of the time. You’re going to slip. They’re going to slip. That’s life.

        However, the fucking CHILD CASINO still exists. Maybe you can keep your kids out of it, but there are still kids getting addicted to gambling because nobody is shutting down the child casino. The fact that it exists, at all, should be appalling to any parent; but instead, some of them are defending it because “ohh but they did some good things for Linux gaming”. Get real, my guy.

        • imahappyguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          49 minutes ago

          You’re right, we are far from the point. At what step in the loot box/gambling process is money exchanged. Then tell me how gambling works. Then tell me if they are the same.

          • Chozo@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 minutes ago

            Holy shit, Gabe’s really got you by the balls, eh. We’ve reached the “actually lootboxes aren’t gambling” arc.

            Insane, the lengths some will go to defend shitty behavior from shitty billionaires.

            • imahappyguy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 minutes ago

              If it’s gambling, loot boxes should be items of value, redeemable for cash, correct? And Valve should be the one providing that cash, as they are the child casino, correct?

              The fact that you aren’t answering is an answer in and of itself. You can reduce yourself to insults, but it only harms your arguement.

              It is gambling, but only as much as Pokémon and Disney’s Lorcana. And that’s perfectly legal. You would need to go after those practices too. But I think you’d find a hard time with that. You know why? Cause it was dismissed in 1999 in New York v Nintendo of America. Gotta change the law for what you want, friend.