Back to the (stone) DDR4 age.

  • Link@rentadrunk.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    So what do we do with all the PCs that only support DDR5? Throw them away and get DDR4 ones?

    Don’t get me wrong this is great news but wouldn’t it make more sense to allocate this production to more DDR5 instead as that is the future?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I bet the fact that people are clinging to DDR4-era stuff is partly to blame.

      Like me: I have a bunch of ddr4 stuff because I buy on the Second market. I am part of the problem.

      • kyTdKZx9PtDQ9e56u06@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You shouldn’t see the majority of active users (being ddr4) as the problem, my guy. There has been zero need to upgrade. They created their own problem, they can figure it out.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Last year I built a ddr4 machine. It was easier to source, a bit cheaper, and DDR5 solved zero problems for me.

        People like me saw this coming a mile away and did the same damn thing which is why this is happening.