Resident Pulser@infosec.pubB to Pulse of Truth@infosec.pubEnglish · 19 days agoMeta’s Facial Recognition Plans for Smart Glasses Are Worse Than We Thoughtgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkMeta’s Facial Recognition Plans for Smart Glasses Are Worse Than We Thoughtgizmodo.comResident Pulser@infosec.pubB to Pulse of Truth@infosec.pubEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
minus-squarebrownsugga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoof course- i wasn’t speaking strictly literally there. i’d wager you’d only need like 25% of people to participate for effectively total surveillance but that’s just a guess
minus-squarezergtoshi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoBut that’s what makes it even worse - at least for me.
of course- i wasn’t speaking strictly literally there. i’d wager you’d only need like 25% of people to participate for effectively total surveillance but that’s just a guess
But that’s what makes it even worse - at least for me.