• thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It shocks me that so many people are just blindly downvoting a comment like this. They make a very testable claim, and even cite a specific, easily searchable person, as their source. If you think the claim is unreasonable, it’s very easy to ask them for more background info or sources, preferably while pointing out why you’re sceptical.

      To me, the claim that 16-20 year olds that are full to the brim of hormones, and have had less time to be exposed to various pollution than 30-somethings are more fertile seems reasonable off the bat. I have no doubt that I would have become a parent at 18 if it weren’t for contraceptives, yet I’m now closer to 30 and haven’t become a parent despite trying for a while. One side of that is that at 18 you’re more likely to be constantly pounding like bunnies, another side is that stress, pollutants, and probably a whole host of other factors make you less fertile with age.

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah let’s all send nature articles to back up everything said on the internet.

      Just google plastic infertility or some other combination of terms and see the many studies published and take your pick.