• brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can’t get the full article.

    Is that really saying they sent updates to non-glasses users’ phones only to access their biometrics, so they can basically broadcast that identification to their glasses?

    No way this is EU GDPR compliant. So glad I got a phone that doesn’t come with system-embedded meta shit.

    • the_wonderfool@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      “Though not yet enabled, NameTag sits inside a Meta AI companion app that’s been downloaded over 50 million times and is necessary for use of key features of its smart glasses, including Ray-Ban and Oakley models. If activated, it will transform faces captured by Meta’s glasses into unique biometric signatures, commonly known as faceprints, and check each one against faceprints stored on the user’s phone—a database that’s currently configured to receive updates from Meta. Recognized faces will trigger notifications, while the rest are cropped, indexed, and saved to a folder marked ‘pending’.”

      It seems that the code is in the specific app for the glasses. Another very relevant passage:

      “NameTag would revive a type of technology Meta said it had sunsetted in 2021, when the company announced it would delete more than a billion faceprints belonging to Facebook users following years of controversy over its photo-tagging system. Meta ultimately paid $650 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by Illinois users and, in 2024, agreed to a separate $1.4 billion settlement with Texas over allegations it had unlawfully collected biometric data from users.”