• agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think one of the points Mickey would make is you can’t entirely trust the scientific framework because it’s still coming from our flawed senses. Even if everything adds up, it could still be a lie. Solipsism and all that.

    I don’t think anyone is talking about metaphysical idealism, but conceptual things shouldn’t be written off because they are inconvenient. Numbers aren’t physical, but I doubt you’d say they don’t exist and therefore should be ignored, unless you’re the most extreme materialist.

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Eliminative materialism isn’t my thing no. Emergent materialism is what I roll with. So the human mind and culture and numbers are things that exist as emergent properties of other things.

      Sure it could all be a lie with us living in the matrix or so on, and it’s fun to entertain such thoughts every now and then. But I won’t accept it as truth without a better reason than “but technically it’s possible”.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Now I’m not sure you get what the allegory of the cave is about. It’s literally trying to explain that our perception can’t be 100% trusted.