• SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    When the 30% fee gets lowered prices won’t come down. The market has already shown that consumers are willing to pay for the games at the current price level. Publishers will just pocket the increased revenue, instead of passing it on to the consumer.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        True, but that’s not the goal of this initiative. The people behind this initiative want to pay less for games.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            There’s a cost to maintaining infrastructure, and EGS is laying off employees because their 12% cut isn’t sustainable.

            • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Stop defending billionaires, the infrastructure costs are a small fraction of the fees they charge

              • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                Seeing as Epic is losing money with a 12% cut, and Steam actually goes down to 20% if you sell enough units, your case doesn’t seem particularly good.

                Also, Valve is funneling a ton of money into Linux gaming, especially into open source software. That’s infrastructure. And some of it is infrastructure that won’t go away if Valve goes bankrupt or enshittifies.

                Also, you’re backing up someone who’s unironically parroting propaganda from a monopolist (Tim Sweeney). Get over yourself.

                • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  The comparison to Epic (with a massively lower sales volume) is a bad one, because Valve’s sales volume is so much higher. Once you have a store up and running, the marginal cost of additional units sold in software is extremely low, so most sales are close to 30% of pure profit for Valve.

                  The entire Apple App Store costs $100 million a year to run, with revenue recently hitting $1.4 trillion, an infrastructure to revenue ratio of a fraction of a percent. That makes their 30% vig even more unconscionable than Valve’s obscene rake.