Innerworld@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agoThe US House rejects an extension of FISA's Section 702, ensuring the warrantless surveillance program will expire for the first time since its 2008 enactmentwww.politico.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down10cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up149arrow-down1external-linkThe US House rejects an extension of FISA's Section 702, ensuring the warrantless surveillance program will expire for the first time since its 2008 enactmentwww.politico.comInnerworld@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareYoFrodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·17 days ago*legally allowed warrantless surveillance It seems that lately if something isn’t actively enforced then the govt just gets away with breaking the law
*legally allowed warrantless surveillance
It seems that lately if something isn’t actively enforced then the govt just gets away with breaking the law