• DrCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It was a rhetorical question. I know she said that about Epstein, but what about her husband who socialised with him plus the business practises at Microsoft

      • ProfThadBach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I am sure she was fine with it because she married him and grew rich off his unethical business practices. She got what she wanted.

        • bizarroland@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, I don’t quite understand why or how we try to give the wives of these evil megalomaniac billionaires a free pass.

          They are either complicit, helping them to be evil megalomaniac billionaires, or they simply do not care what the evil megalomaniac billionaires do as long as they get to live the rich life.

          • The reason is sexism.

            Either people believe the wives to be innocent because something something men suck women are the best and can do no wrong unlike evil men,

            Or

            People believe the wives re innocent becausw they think the women too dumb to know what was going on or too disinterested to find out.

            Both are sexist bullshit pushed by people who don’t understand the rich are all in it together, and are all opposed to being held accountable by the poors