When I wrote a few months ago that code review is not about catching bugs, the most common pushback I got was a variation of the same thing:“If you’re only getting to that decision at the code revi...
I agree that the AI generated image is trashy, however the article is a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of relying on agentic coding, instead of collaborating with other developers.
But there is always a ceiling on how far a single-player game can take you, even with agents. Software that lasts, software that grows, software that people can actually depend on – that is built by groups of people exercising judgment together over time. By teams developing shared taste, shared mental models, shared sense of what their product should be. None of that happens through individual prompting, no matter how clever the prompts.
I agree that the AI generated image is trashy, however the article is a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of relying on agentic coding, instead of collaborating with other developers.
So. Is that an em dash
Given their answer to “was the article AI generated?” was “the article is about…” we can safely assume it’s slop.
So is that a yes? AI slop?