• CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      npm, yes. Snap and flatpak? No. I’m not saying it’s impossible to get malware. The difference is that snapd and flatpak have various levels of process isolation that largely mitigates any potential issues.

      The argument isn’t “Linux doesn’t have malware”, the argument is “you don’t need to run antivirus on Linux”. Those are two very different things.

      Not even the best antivirus will protect you completely, at that point you need good computer hygiene.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Eh. Flatpak has the option for process isolation, but it kinda works similarly to how android apps have default permissions set and the packager can just go “nah, this gets FULL permissions” and unless you go look and change it yourself, the program isn’t restricted at all. I don’t use ubuntu/snapd so can’t speak to that.

        There are more protections on flathub than the AUR for sure - the AUR is closer to just downloading random shit off the internet than a true repository. That said, it’s crazy to assign the vulnerabilities of the AUR to Arch as a whole… The Arch repos proper (and even Chaotic AUR) didn’t have problems during any of this.