restingOface@quokk.au to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agobattlecheatquokk.auimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1600arrow-down112
arrow-up1588arrow-down1imagebattlecheatquokk.aurestingOface@quokk.au to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squareHazel@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 days agoDon’t you always mark the opponent’s shots?
minus-squareEntertainmeonly (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·2 days agoThey didn’t come with enough markers originally to do that. The only way i was able to as a kid was because we had the peices from a second game set.
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days agoIt’s always had way more miss markers than we ever needed. And it was in the mid 80s
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agoI suppose strictly speaking you only need to mark the hits. If you’re not cheating, your opponent’s misses don’t really matter much.
minus-squarePatrikvo@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 hours agoLook at this amateur, not even psychologically analysing his opponents during a board game. Probably doesn’t even keep a secret record on his oppents either.
Don’t you always mark the opponent’s shots?
They didn’t come with enough markers originally to do that. The only way i was able to as a kid was because we had the peices from a second game set.
It’s always had way more miss markers than we ever needed. And it was in the mid 80s
I suppose strictly speaking you only need to mark the hits. If you’re not cheating, your opponent’s misses don’t really matter much.
Look at this amateur, not even psychologically analysing his opponents during a board game. Probably doesn’t even keep a secret record on his oppents either.