• Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Maybe they should have used AI to write a better script. Or maybe it’s so ass because they actually did. Probably the worst film I’ve seen in the last 5 years, and that’s really saying something.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My theory is the original ending was super controversial in focus groups. The main characters were basically the next messiah, there was this whole subtext about usurping major religion, destabilizing the world, etc. The ending we got basically abandoned all character development up to that point. There was probably a better ending out there that got scrubbed in favor of a “Let’s just kinda play it safe” nothing burger.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        And that is what is ruining cinema now a days. They focus rest everything and make it please everyone so it is just a bland story. Disney is really bad for this.

    • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Well now I kind of want to see it! What about it was particularly noteworthy, or was it just the modern “meh” of spectacle without plot?

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        19 hours ago

        This was way worse than the average “bad film” lol. It was completely nonsensical and so full of massive plot holes that it has to be some kind of record. And it wasn’t even bad in a fun way, just irritating and dumb unfortunately. Even the CGI sucked…

        I would’ve walked out halfway through the film if I hadn’t been there with someone.

        • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Absolutely this.

          The tonal shifts were baffling. I didn’t know if it was supposed to be serious or funny. Like was it campy or bad? I do not know.

          I do recall enjoying Blunt’s performance. Her acting is very good. Her dialogue and the script just brought it down though.

      • tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Imagine watching the main character, go up to another character and start berating them with listicles of moments in their lives (you as a viewer have no idea of) while simultaneously being annoyed that they feel compulsed to berate the other character with listicles of their lives. Which are supposed to be all these amazing and quiet moments which a strange person shouldn’t know. So the other character its getting all teary-eyed while the main character’s annoyance resolves into smugness who then cries and screams about all of it. Repeat.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        From everyhing ive seen, its a modern remake of close encounters, but with all the trappings of current year Hollywoo.

        CD and special effects feel less magical, its the reason Project Hail Mary felt different. Everyone knew Ryan was acting along side a puppet. Good sci-fi is possible, but reality is too jaded and needs things to be a bit more hopeful.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No joke, I think it would have that kind of effect if Spielberg was actually using it. Now I have to go back to watch Duel from when he was brimming with ideas and not thoroughly cooked.