• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    That’s quite easy, the books are balanced, there are just more debits than credits. “Balancing the books” doesn’t mean that the net result is zero, it means that all the money going in and going out is accounted for.

    OpenAI can keep bleeding money as long as there are fools willing to fund it in exchange for the illusion of future profits.

    • uninvitedguest@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You can’t have balanced books where there are more debits than credits. That would be out of balance.

      Balanced means debits = credits.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m not an accountant, but you can certainly balance books while showing a loss. Double-entry bookkeeping simply means that every transaction has two parts, and “balancing” simply means that all the transactions cancel out properly.

        I joke with my accountant friends that their entire job is counting to zero.

        • uninvitedguest@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          A loss is not an imbalance of debits and credits, but how much of those debits end up in expenses and the credits end up in revenue.

          DR Expense $1,000
          CR Cash $1,000
          

          With no other activity in a period, that is a $1,000 loss funded by cash.

          DR Expense $1,000
          CR Loan $1,000
          

          Is a loss funded by borrowings.

          DR Sales Discounts $1,000
          CR Sales Revenue $1,000
          

          Is 0 profit/expense as the sale was marked down to 0 (assuming no cost of sales).

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Exactly. My terminology might not be correct, but my point is that their books can be perfectly balanced, and they can also be losing a shit-ton of money, as long as investors keep shoveling money in.

            • uninvitedguest@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Yeah the terminology

              the books are balanced, there are just more debits than credits

              is the opposite of everything discussed above.