• WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The technology exists, the business model is successful at a small scale, so they just need to scale

    could you provide details on that?

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You could probably research the company but from my direct experience

      • Cursor is one of the stronger contenders for coding - bringing a variety of models to tools where coders are.
      • Cursor switched to pay per use, significantly increasing costs and didn’t lose customers
      • cursor charged more for higher end models and didn’t lose customers
      • grok is not currently there, or at least not what I can see, so is a huge gap from an xAI perspective
      • it seems good enough business model to business people to be worth a huge purchase

      Once grok is added to Cursor, I will just have it, along with a variety of other models, and can simply choose it based on cost and effectiveness. It may even be chosen for me since I usually leave it in automatic, and my company is a paying customer where each engineer spends a budget

      Also it’s more like a subscription. Software companies love a subscription model with regular income, rather than selling something you pay for once