• Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not the point. The point is that if this is an attempt at reporting cool new tech usable by the masses, then it should be posted as written coverage. YouTube videos can easily be perceived as content churn rather than reputable sources of information.

    But if that wasn’t the point of the post by OP, we’re all good here.

    I think we’re all on the same side, looking at it from all angles. 🤷‍♂️

      • Beacon@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nobody said it was, and is irrelevant. I will quote my other reply to explain the intended point:

        If the only media reporting about a new technology is a video then that thing is significantly more likely to be bullshit