• Delilah (She/Her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    tar doesn’t even provide compression. Which may be what you want. If you have a weak CPU and a big storage device why would you waste the cpu cycles? I know I’ve removed the compression step in AUR builds for example. But if you don’t know what it does, maybe an all in one solution like 7zip or winrar might be a more attractive prospect.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The tar format doesn’t, but the tar command has command line flags for a number of compression algorithms, and if your algorithm of choice doesn’t have a flag, you can just pipe it to the compression program.

    • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Compressed tars suck anyway since you need to decompress them in order to get the list of files inside, unlike in any other sane archive format.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The pixz compressor provides parallized compression/decompression (desirable on modern CPUs), uses LZMA (like 7zip or xz), and provides indexed access when used as tar's compressor. The last of these is what you want.

        https://github.com/vasi/pixz

        $ tar cvf foo.tar.pixz -Ipixz foo/
        

        pixz is packaged in Debian-family distros.

      • bus_factor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I very rarely list the content of compressed files, so that doesn’t bother me much.

        Back in the day the trick to get better compression on zip files was to first make an uncompressed zip file, and then put that in a compressed zip file. tar did that all by itself!

        • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I mean that’s what GUI archivers do when you open the file.

          So tar is only useful for some kind of automatic workflows where archives are processed automatically. Like what package managers do.

          • bus_factor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The only thing I’ve done with a GUI archiver for the past 20+ years is right click on a file and select “extract to here”. But more commonly I just extract things on the command line, without any automatic processing.