weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1691arrow-down110
arrow-up1681arrow-down1imageMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·2 days agoexactly why private ownership is morally better, no shareholders to expect reasons for actions
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 days agoDo you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·2 days agomakes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
minus-squaresfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoBut that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?
exactly why private ownership is morally better, no shareholders to expect reasons for actions
Do you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
makes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
But that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?