• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Or peacefully migrate to areas that are sustainable and contribute to the project of rebuilding.

    But, again, the capacity to build and supply life sustaining amenities and the political willingness to distribute them in order to curry political favor rather than just generate profit will be central to a country’s power projection into the late 21st century.

    • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So where is that going to be? If the rest of the world doesn’t run that way (which isn’t possible), what do you think happens then? When sea rise lifts things a couple of meters, billions are displaced. You aren’t simply going to put them somewhere else. Europe currently is struggling with climate and war migrants, the US is the same.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        the rest of the world doesn’t run that way (which isn’t possible)

        It is possible. And the bitter irony is that it would be better for everyone on average. Just not better for a few specific people on the whole.

        When sea rise lifts things a couple of meters, billions are displaced.

        Where will they run to? Not the US Gulf Coast or the Dutch flatlands. Not to the low lying Caribbean Islands or the coastline of Japan or Australia.

        The most Climate Change friendly regions are going to be high altitude but still retain access to lots of potable water. Curiously enough, that looks like… Iran, Venezuela, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

        All those Western yahoos screaming about illegal immigrants are on track to become ones. And right back to the countries they spent generations pissing off.