

4·
6 days agoIf I read Article 51 correctly, in this part: “[…] if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations […]” it could be argued that the Donbass republics were/are not members of the UN.
Or do i misunderstand something?
If I read Article 51 correctly, in this part: “[…] if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations […]” it could be argued that the Donbass republics were/are not members of the UN.
Or do i misunderstand something?
Thank you for the answer. I have regular discussions with a friend and he still has the opinion “russia bad”. In my country the media never gets tired to speak and write of the “russias illegal aggression war”. This exact wording is in every article and interview it’s obvious something is wrong.
It’s the same with “islamist terror organization Hamas” in every article, always the same words.