BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 17 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 12th, 2025

help-circle



  • Nevermind I googled him. I don’t get why you dislike him, seems like you agree on most things? He looks down on coloured people, just like you do? What’s your issue with him?

    While you’re at it you can look at the thread a little closer and see that you’re literally the only person who had responded to my single comment in the thread.

    So? That’s not an answer to my question. I asked why you only responded to me, not why you responded to me.


  • I don’t know who that is.

    I must ask though: It seems like you like to argue, so I am curious why you choose to engage with this flimsy mudslinging, instead of the many comments giving you substantial resources to engage yourself with?
    If you want to have a discussion about geopolitics why skirt around all the geopolitical information youve been given in so many comments, but instead merely go for some weak attempt at being a guttersnipe?



  • “Fun house” is bit of a lacking interpretation. It’s a sort of danish triple-entendre. The Danish word is “lysthus” - Literally translated it would be joy-house.
    However “lyst” in this context could both mean “joy” and “lust”.

    Furthermore “lysthus” doesnt refer to a bordello or something like that, but a closed pavillon - A gazebo with walls. But because “lysthus” litteraly means “lusthouse” it has been used as a metaphor for bordellos and the like at times.

    So then you come to “kommunister i lysthuset” where you’re both playing on the imagery of a closed pavillon and the literal word, in order to make the transferrence you’re talking about a vagina.
    I love it.




  • So on the one hand we have clearly flawed accusations of genocide from a country with a long history of using such accusations to advance it’s own geopolitical goals, fabricated by people who are doing their best to kill Muslims all over the world, but they’re apparently extremely worried about this group for some reason.

    On the other hand we have those dastardly conniving Asians who have the support of 72 filthy untrustworthy Muslim countries saying no genocide is occuring.
    Oh and all the independent observators who have visited and reported no genocide is ongoing. Don’t believe them? Go for yourself! The region is free to travel.

    Yeah real headscratcher. Both sides and so on. Can’t trust anyone.

    Have you actually read the report?
    It’s based on the account of 6 “anonymous” Uyghurs who were asked how many people were disappeared from their village. This number was then used to extrapolate to represent the entire Uyghur population.
    It also argues that children not born, because women have access to contraceptives, are part of the genocide. This is weird because we apparently can’t trust what China says is going on in the region, but we can use their numbers for the region? Okie dokie. Also the Uyghurs were never under the one child policy, which strikes me as counter productive if you wanna genocide a group.


  • I do condemn it. I condemn the US for giving aid to militant jihadist terrorgroups in the Xinjiang province with the purpose of destabilising the region.
    I condemn Adrian Zenz and all his ilk for his “divine anti-communist mission” and for pretending to be an expert on a country youve visited once and the language of which you dont speak.
    I condemn all the redditors for their sophomoric approach to life where they pretend to be experts on a subject they’ve never investigated beyond the state department propaganda shoved in their face every day.
    I condemn China for not being perfect in it’s administration of the anti-radicalisation programmes I guess.

    Have you actually read the “report” about the “Uyghur genocide”? Have you read the “Xinjiang police files”? Or are you just so insulated in the western echo chamber you don’t even know of them?


  • Fuck Russia and all its bullshit propaganda. Gtfo with this insane straw man no true Scotsmen begging the question super combo of logical fallacy.

    Fallacy fallacy.
    Also none of your fallacies apply lol. A meme representing a pretty common occurrence isn’t strawmanning, unless any representation of any persons opinion is a strawman, which would make the concept entirely meaningless. I don’t even get how you get the two others except by being a bot that exists to deploy thought terminating clichés.
    Go back to Reddit where these trite regurgitations earn you le gold instead of derision. Or go back to the server farm in Langley.