• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 14 days ago
cake
Cake day: February 5th, 2026

help-circle







  • Saying that it’s good at one thing and bad at others.

    But that’s exactly the difference between narrow AI and a generally intelligent one. A narrow AI can be “superhuman” at one specific task - like generating natural-sounding language - but that doesn’t automatically carry over to other tasks.

    People give LLMs endless shit for getting things wrong, but they should actually get credit for how often they get it right too. That’s a pure side effect of their training - not something they were ever designed to do.

    It’s like cruise control that’s also kinda decent at driving in general. You might be okay letting it take the wheel as long as you keep supervising - but never forget it’s still just cruise control, not a full autopilot.











  • Iconoclast@feddit.uktoTechnology@lemmy.worldai;dr | (ai; didn't read)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Probably didn’t read it because it was clearly low-quality slop - not because the final output was written by AI.

    People don’t mind AI-generated content when they don’t detect it as such. It’s the low-effort garbage they don’t want to deal with.

    Nobody has a perfect radar for AI content. This is just the good old toupee fallacy in action: “All toupees look terrible because I’ve never seen a good one” - except the good ones are the ones you never clocked as toupees.