he mocks confidently because the western ruling class shares rhe same opinions he has

Which is understandable and based (because it doesn’t matter if it’s trump, biden, etc. taking the wheel of the imperialist machine)

It’s libwest.asocial, they support Ukraine because while they think they are anti-war/pacifist western propaganda convinced them that it actually is (it’s also convenient because they don’t have to investigate the other perspective if the enemy are one dimensional orc villains)

You seem confused if you think supporting Russia and Palestine makes you anti-war/pacifist and supporting Russia and Israel makes you America’s laptop.

Last time I checked supporting Russia and Israel doesn’t make you anti-war/pacifist. And supporting Russia hardly makes you America’s lapdog

Supporting Palestine makes you a dog of Russia? Sounds like you don’t fully understand the core of international geopolitics

Don’t bother with the propaganda

Posts a bunch of euro cope

Lol thanks for the laugh

imperialism is when war

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/ch01.htm

https://merics.org/en/comment/chinas-social-credit-system-actually-quite-boring

Instead of taking the opportunity to vastly expand renewables and make a green transition Europe is buying LNG from the US for a way higher price than Russia offered. The green transition has been watered down on European level as well (I wouldn’t call it exponential growth)

Big if true

The German brainpan not able to comprehending a popular socialist government

Voting against the Nazis didn’t work for Germans, but it will work for us. I need my treats for a small time longer you know

Because the piefed social credit score makes it more difficult to bring the people from the political kids table to the political adult table (those anti-communists basically are recreating reddit to keep the “masses” uneducated)

Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it’s trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead

No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite.

Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I’m not sure how to help you. I’m arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn’t possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit?

Provides no examples

Ok bye

Hexbear stays winning with the removed downvote, which forces you to reply if you disagree with the content

I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you’re familiar with Engels text.

I see you’re either scared to be challenged ideologically or it’s not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be.

Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let’s examine it together

How authority is defined and how Engels actually logically provides an answer to the question whether organization without authority is possible