Thank you for explaining this. I’m obviously not technically inclined, so I really appreciate it, and will try to reread it tomorrow so it hopefully clicks for me.

Why can’t SQL do it efficiently?

It isn’t even just Microslop, they’re all absolutely clueless.

Something about being hard to understand something when the paycheck depends on not understanding it.

https://c7.alamy.com/comp/HD2R84/dick-dastardly-muttley-augie-doggie-doggie-daddy-date-unknown-HD2R84.jpg

You’re so welcome; but not just Sandy, it’s all the love, care, and energy you give her. It’s amazingly tender and touching. Your posts ooze love and pride, and I’m here for it!

The simplest fix is to correct the db.

You are welcome! You’re putting in so much dedicated effort, I think you’ll get there, or a close-enough approximation of it. I do hope (and think that probably) Sandy will be okay soon. I also think you two are a great team and really good for each other. It’s been such a blessing taking this vicarious journey with you both, and seeing the portrait @ballshapedman did made my heart swell with vicarious pride, joy, and genuine appreciation for all three of you!

Wow! That’s amazing. Thanking you again for sharing your and Sandy’s odyssey with us!

I’ve also heard “wind sandwich.”

The mistake is not hers. A suspect’s license plate was entered incorrectly—mixing up a zero and the letter O—and her completely valid plate now matches that bad entry in the system. To be clear, her plate is correct. The error exists in the database. The camera reads her plate correctly, matches it to the incorrect entry, and flags her as a suspect every single time.

So why hasn’t the police department corrected it? This lady should sue tf out of the PD.

That’s still not statistically significant, and correlation does not imply causation. It serves as a caution, and I’m inclined to agree it’s not wise to risk it, but let’s be honest with ourselves and others.

Yes it is. Since you’re so educated, tell us about Poe’s Law.

It’s what prompted me to start reading here. And .ml is more informed than the biggest instances of Lemmy, combined.

I’m not into scare mongering, either. The incidence of schizophrenia is very low.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/schizophrenia-prevalence

Because it worked so well in Russia! Just ask Putin and Jeffrey Sachs!

I know what carpet baggers did, and I still don’t support neo-slaver, rewritten revised history narratives.

Rexodous x 3 or 4

Calling bullshit on “conservatives.” The addition of that term plays into identity politics. This is certainly a bipartisan issue.

100% agree

Eh, I’d bet alcohol is more on the everlasting schizophrenia risk side. But weed really does fuck up your thinking.

Like every occasional sixth month or year in a conducive environment, yes, it may enhance thinking outside the box for an insight or few. Daily would be like a milder version of dropping hallucinogens.