31·
5 hours agoIt’s the same cause as the one eight, two nines uptime : just slopping out more code
Certified WokeTM Member of the Tesseract banlist. Get on my level, scrub.
- 14 Posts
- 942 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 29th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Or moon sugar
8·22 hours agowe are all banned on this blessed day
Thank you for listening, I hope you get to enjoy them.
If you want more guitar players that know how to do excellent phrasing, I wrote a long ass post that only 1 person glanced at, I shouted out Gabriel Martin of Consider the Source as a honorable mention.
https://lemmy.world/post/32373621/18023477
EDIT : the song/solo that kicked off that post : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEX4BQ72lNA&t=407s
hell yeah , that’s a fucking awesome band
https://considerthesourcemusic.bandcamp.com/track/you-won-a-goat
IDK davey, he banned half the fediverse, maybe the comments he’s reading are all supportive since he decided that he’s not going to listen to those of us that disagree.
He can’t even see this text because he put me in his fancy banlist.
There was one in the fucking github, and a secret one.
Are you claiming the original was a remake or the 2012 one he produced was a remake?
Development of the film began in the mid-1970s when David Foster and fellow producer Lawrence Turman suggested to Universal Pictures an adaptation of the 1938 John W. Campbell novella Who Goes There? It had been loosely adapted once before in Howard Hawks’ and Christian Nyby’s 1951 film The Thing from Another World, but Foster and Turman wanted to develop a project that stuck more closely to the source material.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(1982_film)#Production
I’m saying the 82 film was a re-whatever of the 51 film/book.
“Prodigious artist visits old artist in his home”
I wouldn’t get my hopes up. Carpenter’s a cool guy, word probably got out he liked Peele’s work and Peele obviously decided to give the old man a visit.
BTW : Carpenter is still rockin’ on bandcamp with his son.
I love the way it’s always assumed that a remake of The Thing would do some kind of service/disservice to John Carpenter.
He made a fucking remake. If someone else does a remake, it’s fucking whatever. Carpenter did a fantastic fucking remake, but it’s still a remake.
Like if someone remade The Fly. Cronenberg did a fantastic job. Is it his fucking film? No. It was a remake.
1·1 day agoI’m assuming (op is) male, so (he has) a mountain to climb anyway, […] and probably find similar success
The game is rigged as fuck
and I can’t really message one on a dating app and be like “yea I just wanna fuck you”.
I mean… Isn’t that the point of dating apps? I’m assuming you’re male, so you have a mountain to climb anyway, but you can treat the people in wheelchairs you find on there the same way you treat other people and probably find similar success.
The weakest Debian using greybeard :
OldBeardyGuyAtAnvil.jpg
How are you not on the fucking Tesseract ban list with those kinds of comments?
It’s the same thing as the Covid subsidiaries. Covid subsidiaries were meant to keep people’s lives roughly similar during the pandemic. Businesses jizzed that money everywhere, and when they ran out, they fired a shitload of people, and blamed the subsidiaries; the actual fault was them jizzing money everywhere.
The AI can lead to some efficiency gains. Rich people are using it as an excuse to fire everybody
glad to be of service. I wish this was a reply to a different comment, but I’m glad to help Carpenter’s new works get more attention from people that enjoy it.