

uses the word “integer” in a communication with the user
Oh honey…
Unc among uncs.


uses the word “integer” in a communication with the user
Oh honey…
I think they allow it as long as you have the Joual language pack, -tbnk


gotta add the babbage classic :
On two occasions I have been asked, — “Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?” In one case a member of the Upper, and in the other a member of the Lower, House put this question. I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.


One dude just got his phD in computer science and admitted to me he cannot even use his phone. Wish I was joking
I mean, computer science is basically the mathematics of computation. It’s not like the people working on knot theory or topology are great with 3d art or knitting


I’m also impressed with GLM-5.3-Flash. This is similar to Claude Opus 4.8. It’s much smaller and cheaper than GLM-5.3, and still incredibly capable. It’s also actually feasible for an individual person to get hardware to run it, like if you can one day get your hands on a Mac Studio with 512GB of RAM.
512 GB of RAM?!
My brother in christ I don’t even have 12 GB of ram! I don’t even have 512GB of SSD storage!


I thought this was a follow up to :
https://lemmy.world/post/52837955/26212598
so I had a great laugh at it.


That’s a preference though, not a hard loss


yes yes, it’s all AI and IBM so it’s made of the same algos that ran the Nazi concentration camps.
I don’t want to RELISH news of them doing more, and I’m not going to kiss their ass because they spent 0.00000000000001% of their earnings on one patch.


… doesn’t that prove their point?


I mean, the 127.0.0.1 makes sense, but It could be it being sent to that port from VS code… why does my local ollama have any kind of telemetry? is it for network users or if I serve to outside my local machine, so telemetry being sent to me? I think it’s disabled anyway.


… Why the fuck is there telemetry on my local AI?? I tried Qwen3.5:2b
slot launch_slot_: id 0 | task 17 | processing task, is_child = 0
slot operator(): id 0 | task 17 | new prompt, n_ctx_slot = 8192, n_keep = 4, task.n_tokens = 439
slot operator(): id 0 | task 17 | cached n_tokens = 258, memory_seq_rm [258, end)
slot init_sampler: id 0 | task 17 | init sampler, took 0.15 ms, tokens: text = 439, total = 439
[GIN] 2026/10/11 - 16:08:03 | 200 | 324.081µs | 127.0.0.1 | GET "/api/ps"
[GIN] 2026/10/11 - 16:08:03 | 200 | 71.38µs | 127.0.0.1 | GET "/api/ps"
[GIN] 2026/10/11 - 16:08:03 | 200 | 164.616µs | 127.0.0.1 | GET "/api/ps"
[GIN] 2026/10/11 - 16:08:03 | 200 | 96.902µs | 127.0.0.1 | GET "/api/ps"
[GIN] 2026/10/11 - 16:08:04 | 200 | 64.533µs | 127.0.0.1 | GET "/api/ps"
time=2026-10-11T16:08:04.525-03:00 level=WARN source=types.go:1035 msg="invalid option provided" option=_capturingTokenCorrelationId
time=2026-10-11T16:08:04.530-03:00 level=WARN source=types.go:1035 msg="invalid option provided" option=_otelTraceContext
time=2026-10-11T16:08:04.530-03:00 level=WARN source=types.go:1035 msg="invalid option provided" option=_telemetryTurn
[GIN] 2026/10/11 - 16:08:04 | 200 | 105.201776ms | 127.0.0.1 | GET "/api/ps"
time=2026-10-11T16:08:04.801-03:00 level=INFO source=sched.go:1338 msg="updated VRAM based on existing loaded models" gpu=0 library=Vulkan total="2.2 GiB" available="2.2 GiB"
.ML users left in shambles.
You know, if they could still access lemmy in general.


Thank you
https://www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texte
The Debian Project nevertheless expects that all contributions submitted to Debian, regardless of how and with which tools they were produced, satisfy the same standards of quality, correctness, maintainability, and legal compliance. The use of a generative AI tool does not diminish the contributor’s responsibility for the work they submit. Contributors are expected to understand, review, test, and, where appropriate, modify AI-assisted output before incorporating it into Debian. Blindly accepting or uploading AI-generated material without appropriate human review is inconsistent with Debian’s established development practices. We enourage [sic] our contributors to disclose whether a contribution was made with AI assitance[sic], but do not require them to do so.


I pulled a word out my ass because I can’t be bothered with looking it up all the way for this ambiguous term.
Basically, like “sportswashing” they are trying to cover up/compensate for their horrible behaviour by releasing crumbs like this to gain goodwill. I’m not going to change my opinion on facebook being a piece of shit scourge on humanity just because they put some ram efficiencies in linux.


I used user@example.com … so should that be fine or not?


I don’t want to have anything to do with facebook, that’s why. It’s fucking charity washing


Time to reset the dB again
Im looking for work and trying to understand what you said.