Mate is from the Cono sur anyway, don’t want to use anything related to the Argies.

I’ll bite, I don’t mind making an ass out of myself.

I’ve done installs of linux where the fact the internet connection was shit slowed it down. why is the fucking ·iso 4gb if it still needs shit from the internet?

-i, --ignore-case Ignore case distinctions in patterns and input data, so that characters that differ only in case match each other.

Oh , would you look at that. Great. What’s the quotes do?

As a prior child who now has nearly 30 years of IT experience, that’s adorable. 10 minutes of research and you have been defeated.

Jokes on you, if she does that I win.

Also no, standalone WMs (the ones I’ve seen, anyway)

OK, so I guess I don’t know the “official” name for “standalone window managers”. Which is what I was trying to get at with OSGUI, since WM is built into desktop environments, which leads me to :

Most dynamic/stackings WMs (e.g. Openbox)

https://openbox.org/

It says here that Openbox is to be used in Gnome or KDE. Can you use it as a standalone WM? I don’t see it in my listing in my little fedora UI testbed VM :

$ dnf environment list --available 
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
ID                                Name                                 Installed
custom-environment                Fedora Custom Operating System              no
workstation-product-environment   Fedora Workstation                          no
server-product-environment        Fedora Server Edition                       no
cloud-server-environment          Fedora Cloud Server                         no
kde-desktop-environment           KDE Plasma Workspaces                       no
kde-mobile-environment            KDE Plasma Mobile                           no
xfce-desktop-environment          Xfce Desktop                                no
phosh-desktop-environment         Phosh Desktop                               no
lxde-desktop-environment          LXDE Desktop                                no
lxqt-desktop-environment          LXQt Desktop                                no
cinnamon-desktop-environment      Cinnamon Desktop                            no
mate-desktop-environment          MATE Desktop                                no
sugar-desktop-environment         Sugar Desktop Environment                   no
budgie-desktop-environment        Budgie Desktop                              no
cosmic-desktop-environment        COSMIC Desktop                              no
developer-workstation-environment Development and Creative Workstation        no
basic-desktop-environment         Basic Desktop                               no
i3-desktop-environment            i3 desktop                                  no
miraclewm-desktop-environment     Miracle WM Desktop Environment              no
sway-desktop-environment          Sway Desktop                                no

don’t encourage you to launch applications as fullscreen windows. Tiling WMs specifically are about putting multiple windows on the same desktop, visible at the same time.

Yes, I get that. Do you also get that it’s pretty hard to see the 5th or 8th level of fibonnachi tiling and use it to read text? I mean this in contrast to being able to float them about and whatnot. You either move it to the next desktop or tile it. there’s not much flexability and it’s all designed to be navigated by keyboard shortcuts, wheras gnome does something similar, but expects you to move the mouse to weird places on the screen to get them.

why? if I do Package/package/packages/Packages it’s likely not to hit if it doesn’t match the letter case correctly or if I added the s when it shouldn’t be there.

it’s definitely going to hit ackag , and I don’t have to write as much.

OK, maybe you haven’t tried any of them.

Basically, some people are making interfaces for the operating systems that only have a windows manager, and isn’t a complete desktop environment, so it’s basically one step above a terminal. Things like i3 or dwm, as opposed to more fleshed out things like KDE or Gnome.

Gnome3 basically encourages the user to launch their programs as fullscreen things and scroll between them. The WM based UIs also do this, but call it “desktops” and tile the windows you have in each desktop.

I went through a craze of shoving different ones into VMs and felt that things like i3 and dwm behave similarly to the way I dislike Gnome3.

well, it’s what the individual acronyms stand for. Operating System Graphical User Interface.

something something Gnome is the new Slugdge

fastfetch | grep ackag
Packages: 3582 (dpkg), 17 (flatpak)

I don’t think we have the time

EDIT : I use debian btw. Yes I’m old, male and a father.

Get rekt lmao, stay mad.

Check out geography now, he has covered every country

humans bad

It is not the tool that matters, it’s how it’s used and by who. The technological progress is inevitable, if you want to do good help guide it into the right hands in the right way. Go into making regulations instead of tech development.

BUT WHY SO MANY REPOSTS OF THIS, MY GENDERLESS ACQUAINTANCE?

@eudaemon@mathstodon.xyz I mean… I am one of the dumbest to install linux but archinstall is sometimes easier than the fucking GUItastic fedora installer.

Also non-de WM OSGUIs are basically Gnome3 for neckbeards, but that’s a bit more of a hot take.

Now blame Israel too

In this context,it’s to make newcomers get used to a more open ended version of Linux that has derivatives, to get more mainstream versions of packages so that if they eventually want something more specific, they are learning slight tweaks.

Ubuntu is Debian with a layer of idiosyncratic things applied to it, the new user will need to unlearn those idiosyncrasies and apply new ones.

Also Ubuntu has some controversies associated with it, so the new user should stick to something more … Whatever the antonym of controversial is

It’s Fronken-steen

Stockings are for fems