Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman


Yes, I can hear you, Clem Fandango!

  • 4 Posts
  • 639 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • So, classic Eric Migicovsky. There was a reason I was staying away from this RePebble shit entirely.

    This is the same guy who offered integration between Beeper and iMessage and had it broken by Apple in under a week, and then… just stopped trying after promising it to customers.

    Then when he got bored with Beeper he sold it to Automattic.

    It’s so much like his original run with Pebble as well, where he fucked over the devs on their way out who were promised jobs with the sale of the company, to find out late in the game that wasn’t actually happening.

    I think Migicovsky being allowed to startup companies and then throw them in the bin when he gets bored while pocketing the profit should be outlawed.













  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoSelfhosted@lemmy.world!@$& Homelab Networking
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    When you do it for work, you log what you have changed each time you make a change to try to fix it, and you log what you revert, so you can keep track of what you have tried, what worked, and what didn’t and have a clearer idea of what the solution was.

    Sometimes it really does take a while to nail down though, and sometimes it isn’t entirely clear why what worked worked. Especially if you’re a junior network engineer without as much experience.






  • I think both of your arguments in this thread have merit. You are correct that it is a misused tool, and you are correct that the better solution is a more compassionate society. The other person is also correct that we can and do at least make attempts to make such tools less available as paths to self harm. Since you used the analogy of people jumping off bridges, I have lived near bridges where this was common so barriers and nets were put up to make it difficult for anyone but the most determined to use it as a path to suicide. We are indeed failing people in a society that puts profit over human life first, but even in a more idealized society mental health issues and attempts at suicide would still happen and to not fail those people we would still need to do things like erect barriers and safeguards to prevent self-harm. In my eyes both of you are correct and it is not an either or issue as much as it is a “por que no los dos?” issue. Why not build a better society and still build in safeguards?