

Yeah, agreed.
Yeah, agreed.
Thanks for the response and interesting link. I should have worded my initial comment better, I suppose.
What I am saying it that it may be worth considering that the extraordinary nature of the leak warrants a critical analysis of a possible ulterior motive or furtherance of some other agenda.
What I may be, I don’t know.
However, for instance, even more than the leak itself, I find it ultimately more relevant that a very anti-European stance was expressed in the coziness of a “private” chat by the senior most national-security officials of the US.
Yeah, I find the “accidental” chat with a journalist too strange to take it at face value.
This story is so weird that I take it with grain of salt.
Top level personnel added him to a chat. He wrote a piece that otherwise makes them look good (at least mildly competent). Then left the chat.
For countries, poltical parties and even at the individual level, I think that this is an important lesson of the times:
Do not be too shy to act, do not be too afraid to stand up against the ones that are pushing the boundaries of what is tolerable.