I appreciate that. This was the early days so to speak when people were just beginning to play around, before the current flood of content which was never touched by any person aka the beginning of the dead internet. Personally if it’s a person making something with intent then it’s just another tool but if it’s fully automated aka someone just told an agent to go make content and that’s it then I’m also not a fan.

Every time there’s been a new tool it’s been degraded, like for a long time photography wasn’t considered for art, and then digital art or CGI wasn’t considered art and so on.

There’s still some possibilities here for making actual art. Like if a person replicated AI generated art well enough it triggered people because they thought it was AI but was fully human generated then that could be an intriguing art piece. Either that or probing the neural nets, finding their behavior or where they break or have odd behavior would also be interesting. Like in the early days just toggling one pixel in an image to a specific value would be enough to destroy image recognition which is intriguing.

This is from 2023, the writing, audio, and animations were done by a person. They did use generated images though. AI wasn’t that capable then, for reference the first will AI Smith spaghetti video was released around this time.

Seemed needless to me, but whatever floats their boat. For what its worth the video was written and spoken by an actual person. They did generate the images for the video but animated it. This is pretty old relatively speaking, AI wasn’t as capable 3+ years ago. That first Will Smith spaghetti video was released around this time to give you some context.

I’m not debating their opinion, they are welcome to that.

Man I thought people on her were nicer. Anyways ditto bro.