I could be wrong, but I don’t believe that crabs flesh contains the enzymes that break it down the way lobsters do. I do believe you can buy fresh, dead crab at some markets.
But you should definitely kill any living ones before boiling
But when your boss tells you that you have to keep doing it this way, then you don’t have much choice in the matter. You either keep asking AI for new code and hope it gets it right, or you have to actually delve into the code and spend your time correcting it.
The 1 million lines of code is just untenable, assuming they want code that actually works.
LLMs are - by the nature of how they work - only able to achieve 90-95% accuracy. That’s the theoretical best they can do, according to the people behind OpenAI. And worse, it will be presented as 100% accurate, even going so far as to make up sources wholecloth.
That’s an insane and completely unacceptable error rate for any system even pretending to be mission critical.
Can you imagine sending people to space with a system that has a 1 in 20 chance of just being completely unfit for service?
But when they don’t pass, then you have to dissect a bunch of AI pasta, right?
I dunno man, I tried coding a simply http listener with an LLM one time in python (a language I’m unfamiliar with). Just something to sit on a port, listen for a request, and run a script.
I ended up spending more time troubleshooting the maybe two dozen lines of code than I would have spent just looking up a tutorial online.
Instead of boiling them alive, yes.
Lobsters are the one you are going to see alive most, though, as their meat breaks down very quickly after they die. That isn’t true of most other crustaceans, at least not to the same degree
That was me, and my point was that we already had a suitable, regulated, and relatively safe system in place, ie taxis, so there’s no need for innovation that will needlessly endanger people.
Culinary school recommended a quick kitchen knife through the brain immediately before boiling
Or, we managed to create a society where people are upset about new, unregulated, and, according to the article in question, potentially dangerous technology being implemented with little regard to the public good.
Until it’s multiple self driving cars getting stuck in that intersection
Yea, so what was wrong with Taxis anyway? At least we regulated those
Is it brown people? It’s brown people, isn’t it?
If I had an extra 300 tb I’d do it.
You could cut off your search around the time AI tracks started to appear. Not sure when that was, maybe 2023. You’d miss a lot of recent stuff, but you’d filter out a lot of spam too
Some things are just super obvious that even if we can, we should not
I use it for coding advice sometimes, as an amateur hobbyist it’s really useful to point me in the right direction when facing problems I’m unfamiliar with. I often end up reinventing the proverbial wheel, just worse, but LLMs can help point out standards and best practices that I, as an outsider to the industry, am unaware of.
Movie recommendations is my biggest thing, personally.
And lots of other purposes. Just because a ton of people are misusing this tool and treating it like GAI doesn’t mean that it isn’t a useful tool. Even something as simple as proofreading a letter has massive utility for some people.
Lets use LLMs for things LLMs are useful for. It is not a panacea, and it is not appropriate for every use case
And yet they won’t even consider taking a second look at the other things “liberals” are speaking sensibly about, like abortion and Second Amendment. Even questioning those positions is anathema… but she’s big enough to acknowledge only the one thing that is so obvious that it materially affecting her. And rest assured, she would not be saying “this is not the man I voted for” unless Trump’s ‘policies’ are directly hurting her and her family.